The End-of-Program Review (EPR) was created by Evergreen's Assessment Study Group to improve cross-curricular general education and to help the college recognize and articulate curricular offerings.

History

In Academic Year 2001-02, the Office of Institutional Research and Assessment began surveying faculty at the end of each program. Faculty are asked which divisional areas of the Liberal Arts and other learning activities are included in their programs. Every five years, faculty and staff convene to synthesize results and make refinements to the survey. As a result of the first five-year review, the End-of-Program Review survey was substantially changed for Academic Year 2006-07. Because of the evolutionary nature of this assessment, trend data should be studied within a particular iteration of the survey: AY 2001-02 through AY 2005-06 or AY 2006-07 through AY 2011-12.

You can view:

• Results from recent End-of-Program Reviews (see table below)
• Program Trends AY 2006-07 to AY 2015-16
• Historical Results AY 2006-07 to AY 2011-12
• Early History AY 2001-02 to AY 2005-06

EPR 2015-16

The End-of-Program Review results from Academic Year 2015-16 are the most recent results available. Of the 210 undergraduate programs offered in 2015-16, 159 participated in the End-of-Program Review resulting in a 76% response rate.

You can view:

• A copy of the 2015-16 survey instrument (PDF)
• The Annual EPR Overview for 2015-16 (PDF)
• The Undergraduate Program Overview for 2015-16 (PDF)
• Highlights from EPR 2015-16 (TBD)
• Results of the survey by Academic Area in the table below:

Academic Area	Overview
Art	View
Humanities	View
Math/Quantitative and Symbolic Reasoning	View
Natural, Physical, and Computer Sciences	View
Social Sciences	View
Writing	View
Information Technology Literacy	View
Critical Thinking	View
Sustainability	View
Oppression, Privilege, and Difference	View
Community-Based Projects/Service Learning	View
Student Academic Statement/Advising	View

EPR 2014-15

Of the 180 undergraduate programs offered in 2014-15, 111 participated in the End-of-Program Review resulting in a 62% response rate.

You can view:

• A copy of the 2014-15 survey instrument (PDF)
• The Annual EPR Overview for 2014-15 (PDF)
• The Undergraduate Program Overview for 2014-15 (PDF)
• Highlights from EPR 2014-15 (PDF)
• Results of the survey by Academic Area in the table below:

Academic Area	Overview
Art	View
Humanities	View
Math/Quantitative and Symbolic Reasoning	View
Natural, Physical, and Computer Sciences	View
Social Sciences	View
Writing	View
Information Technology Literacy	View
Critical Thinking	View
Sustainability	View
Oppression, Privilege, and Difference	View
Community-Based Projects/Service Learning	View
Student Academic Statement/Advising	View

EPR 2013-14

Of the 198 undergraduate programs offered in 2013-14, 141 participated in the End-of-Program Review resulting in a 71% response rate.

You can view:

• A copy of the 2013-14 survey instrument (PDF)
• The Annual EPR Overview for 2013-14 (PDF)
• The Undergraduate Program Overview for 2013-14 (PDF)
• Results of the survey by Academic Area in the table below:

Academic Area	Overview
Art	View
Humanities	View
Math/Quantitative and Symbolic Reasoning	View
Natural, Physical, and Computer Sciences	View
Social Sciences	View
Writing	View
Information Technology Literacy	View
Critical Thinking	View
Sustainability	View
Oppression, Privilege, and Difference	View
Community-Based Projects/Service Learning	View
Student Academic Statement/Advising	View

EPR 2012-13

Of the 198 undergraduate programs offered in 2012-13, 141 participated in the End-of-Program Review resulting in a 71% response rate.

You can view:

• A copy of the 2012-13 survey instrument (PDF)
• The Annual EPR Overview for 2012-13 (PDF)
• The Undergraduate Program Overview for 2012-13 (PDF)
• Results of the survey by Academic Area in the table below:

Academic Area	Overview
Art	View
Humanities	View
Math/Quantitative and Symbolic Reasoning	View
Natural, Physical, and Computer Sciences	View
Social Sciences	View
Writing	View
Information Technology Literacy	View
Critical Thinking	View
Sustainability	View
Oppression, Privilege, and Difference	View
Community-Based Projects/Service Learning	View
Student Academic Statement	View
Advising	View